The 2015-16 Annual Report of the Central Water Commission (CWC) presents a comprehensive overview of the progress, initiatives, and challenges faced in the water resources sector in India. This article highlights the key takeaways, data, projects, budget allocation, utilization, pros and cons of the report, and the delays encountered. As an independent observer, I, Raisin George, provide my perspective on the report.

Key Takeaways

1. Design Consultancy: The CWC provided design consultancy for 59 water resources development projects across India and neighboring countries such as Afghanistan, Bhutan, and Nepal.
2. Flood Forecasting: CWC issued 4055 flood forecasts with a 98.1% accuracy rate, aiding in effective flood management.
3. Technical Assistance: Significant support was provided to the Ministry of Water Resources, River Development, and Ganga Rejuvenation on various issues including inter-state water disputes and international water-sharing agreements.
4. Training Programs: The National Water Academy conducted 36 training programs, enhancing the skills of officers from central and state governments.

Highlighted Data

• Geographical and Population Data: The geographical area is 328.7 million hectares, with a population of 1.21 billion (2011).
• Water Resources: Average annual rainfall is 4000 BCM, with a mean annual natural runoff of 1869 BCM.
• Storage Capacity: The total storage capacity from completed major and medium projects is 253 BCM, with an additional 155 BCM under construction.

Projects Implemented

1. Accelerated Irrigation Benefits Programme (AIBP): 149 ongoing projects received grants, with Rs. 2327.80 crore released for 33 major and medium irrigation projects.
2. Flood Management Programme (FMP): 99 schemes were approved with an estimated cost of Rs. 5344.15 crore, and Rs. 1157.07 crore was released during the XII Plan period.
3. Development of Water Resources Information System (DWRIS): Enhanced data collection and dissemination through a standardized national water information system.

Budget Allocation and Utilization

• Allocated Budget: Significant funds were allocated to various programs, including Rs. 2327.80 crore for AIBP and Rs. 1157.07 crore for FMP during the XII Plan period.
• Utilized Budget: The funds were utilized effectively to support numerous projects, though some projects faced delays.

Pros and Cons of the Report

Pros:

1. Comprehensive Data Collection: The report showcases extensive data collection and analysis, aiding in better water resource management.
2. Technological Advancements: Implementation of satellite-based telemetry systems and real-time data acquisition for flood forecasting.
3. Training and Capacity Building: Emphasis on training programs to enhance the skills of water management professionals.

Cons:

1. Project Delays: Despite significant progress, several projects faced delays, impacting overall outcomes.
2. Budget Constraints: While substantial funds were allocated, some areas still faced budgetary constraints, limiting the scope of certain initiatives.

Projects Delayed

• Installation of Satellite-based Telemetry Systems: Installation at 74 additional stations was still in progress.
• Upgradation of Hydrological Observation Stations: Upgradation of certain stations was delayed due to manpower constraints.

I believe the report underscores the critical importance of water resource management for India’s sustainable development. However, timely completion of projects and adequate budget allocation are crucial. It’s imperative for policymakers to address these delays and constraints to ensure effective water resource management. By leveraging technological advancements and enhancing inter-state cooperation, India can better manage its water resources, ensuring water security for future generations.