The Central Water Commission’s (CWC) Annual Report for 2009-10 provides a detailed insight into the organization’s achievements, budget allocations, project implementations, and future directions. The report is essential for understanding the status and management of India’s water resources.

Key Takeaways

1. Design and Consultancy Services: The CWC provided design consultancy for 101 water resources development projects across India and neighboring countries such as Afghanistan, Bhutan, and Nepal.
2. Monitoring and Appraisal: The CWC appraised and monitored several projects, including 58 major, 19 medium, and 9 ERM projects, ensuring the allocation of Rs.5528.626 crore under the AIBP programme.
3. Flood Management: The CWC issued 3991 flood forecasts during the monsoon of 2009, achieving an accuracy rate of 97.87%. This played a crucial role in effective flood management across the country.
4. Hydrological Data: Hydrological observations were carried out at 878 sites, and a satellite-based telemetry system was installed at 165 stations by March 2010.

Highlighted Data

• Geographical and Population Data:
  • Total geographical area: 328.7 M ha
  • Projected population (2008): 1176.74 million
• Water Resources:
  • Average annual rainfall: 3674.43 BCM
  • Estimated utilisable surface water potential: 690 BCM
  • Total replenishable groundwater resources: 433 BCM

Implemented Projects

• Irrigation Projects: Multiple irrigation projects were appraised and monitored, with a significant focus on techno-economic evaluation and flood management.
• Flood Management: The installation of a satellite-based telemetry system and issuance of accurate flood forecasts were notable achievements.

Budget Allocation and Utilisation

• Plan Schemes Budget:

  • National Water Academy: Rs. 2.60 crore
  • Hydrology Project (Phase II): Rs. 1.33 crore
  • Development of Water Resources Information System: Rs. 63.25 crore
  • Investigation of Water Resources Development Schemes: Rs. 7.13 crore

• Non-Plan Budget:

  • Direction & Administration: Rs. 25.56 crore
  • Data Collection: Rs. 82.02 crore
  • Flood Control: Rs. 68.51 crore

Pros and Cons of the Report

Pros:

1. Comprehensive Data Collection: Detailed hydrological data and accurate flood forecasts significantly contributed to effective water resource management.
2. International Cooperation: Collaboration with neighboring countries on water resources projects fostered regional stability and development.

Cons:

1. Project Delays: Some projects, such as the telemetry system installations, experienced delays affecting overall progress.
2. Budget Overruns: Certain areas saw budget overruns, indicating the need for more precise financial planning.

Projects that Were Delayed

• Installation of satellite-based telemetry systems at 165 stations experienced delays, impacting the overall effectiveness of flood forecasting and management.

As an independent observer, I, Raisin George, believe that while the CWC’s efforts in water resource management are commendable, there is a pressing need for more stringent project timelines and budget adherence. The delays and overruns highlight the importance of improved planning and execution strategies. The CWC must continue to build on its strengths, such as its expertise in hydrological data collection and international cooperation, to overcome these challenges and achieve its mission more effectively.